In analysis step three, i used CFA once the discussed more than toward 8 things, determined indices regarding internal texture, correlations of one’s ECR-RD8 scale score into the RQ to address inquiries off convergent legitimacy, differences when considering some one already during the a love versus. men and women currently not during the a relationship, and you can relationships that have general lifetime satisfaction. 0.step 3 together with IBM SPSS twenty five.
Efficiency Investigation step 3
In sample 3, the two-dimensional model of the ECR-RD8 showed acceptable model fit according to the majority of criteria, ? 2 (19) = 210.7, p < 0.001, CFI = 0.969, TLI = 0.940, RMSEA = 0.135, SRMR = 0.071. Internal consistency (McDonald's Omega) was 0.83 for anxiety and 0.82 for avoidance. To address the question of convergent validity, we correlated ECR-RD8 subscales with RQ subscales. ECR-RD8 anxiety and avoidance subscales were weakly to moderately associated with each other. Both ECR-RD8 subscales correlated negatively with RQ security, and positively with RQ fearful. ECR-RD8 anxiety was slightly associated with RQ dismissing, and moderately with RQ preoccupied. ECR-RD8 avoidance was associated with RQ dismissing, but not with RQ preoccupied (see Table 3).
The ECR-RD8 anxiety subscale was significantly higher for individuals currently not in a relationship than for individuals in a relationship (M = 3.47 (SD = 1.56) vs.